Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-08 08:34:26

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] intrusive tagging allows omision of unneeded headers"
Previous message: Ulrich Eckhardt: "[boost] bidirectional pointer proposal"
In reply to: Pavol Droba: "Re: [boost] Incorrect extensions for cygwin gcc builds"

Pavol Droba <droba_at_[hidden]> writes:

>
> If I compile cygwin version of bjam, would it solve my problem?

Yes, provided you only use it for cygwin gcc builds

> I thought, that the problem is not in bjam, but in tools settings

No, the reason it's hard to fix in this version of Boost.Build is
precisely because the toolset gets no control over the extensions
used.

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

Next message: Thorsten Ottosen: "[boost] intrusive tagging allows omision of unneeded headers"
Previous message: Ulrich Eckhardt: "[boost] bidirectional pointer proposal"
In reply to: Pavol Droba: "Re: [boost] Incorrect extensions for cygwin gcc builds"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk