Boost logo

Boost :

From: Stefano Delli Ponti (stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-09 09:21:35


From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> "William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here,
> > or should I use the std:: exceptions?
>
> IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides
> more-specific information.

Agreed. And we should keep coherence with the filesystem library.

Sted


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk