|
Boost : |
From: William E. Kempf (wekempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-09 09:54:13
> From: "Stefano Delli Ponti" <stefano.delliponti_at_[hidden]>
> From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> > "William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >
> > > That's a good idea. So would users prefer new exception types here,
> > > or should I use the std:: exceptions?
> >
> > IMO, it's always safer to use an exception type which provides
> > more-specific information.
>
> Agreed. And we should keep coherence with the filesystem library.
I'm not sure there's any coherence to keep here. Do you have specific concerns/thoughts here?
William E. Kempf
wekempf_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk