Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: William E. Kempf (wekempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-09 12:02:47

Next message: Gabriel Dos Reis: "Re: [boost] Re: Metaprogramming: Using static const or enum?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Call for regression test volunteers"
Maybe in reply to: Stefano Delli Ponti: "Re: [boost] Next revision of boost::thread"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: Re: [boost] Next revision of boost::thread"

> From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>

> I think that a reasonable requirement that we already mentioned several
> times is that the ID should be CopyConstructible, Assignable and
> LessThanComparable, for use in sets/maps.

Should it truly be LessThanComparable, or should it follow the design of std::type_info with a before() method? I'm happy either way, I just want to understand the rationale for the design choice.

William E. Kempf
wekempf_at_[hidden]

Next message: Gabriel Dos Reis: "Re: [boost] Re: Metaprogramming: Using static const or enum?"
Previous message: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] Call for regression test volunteers"
Maybe in reply to: Stefano Delli Ponti: "Re: [boost] Next revision of boost::thread"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: Re: [boost] Next revision of boost::thread"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk