|
Boost : |
From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-09 16:37:07
[2003-01-09] David Abrahams wrote:
>Toon Knapen <toon.knapen_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> On Thursday 09 January 2003 12:12, Rene Rivera wrote:
>>> It's doesn't because I haven't had time to add it since the toolset
>>> appeared in Boost.Build ;-) I'll try and add ASAP. ... Question on
this...
>>> Is it a possibility to install only the C compiler (cc) without the C++
>>> compiler (aCC)? I'm asking to see if I can use the presense of "aCC" as
an
>>> indicator that it's all installed.
>>
>> I guess cc is installed by default (like on all unices) and aCC is a
>> commerical product. So cc is always there and aCC is'nt.
>>
>> Anyway, to compile jam_src you can use cc (with the -Ae option though)
as
>> you can see in the Jambase.
>
>Yeah, I think on Unix, defaulting to cc unless the script knows better
>is a god idea. It would've prevented this issue with getting aCC to
>build it in the first place. That's what the Perforce makefile does,
>too.
OK that seems like a good idea. I'll add generic Unix cc toolset for
building bjam.
But for aCC, can one of you tell what the output of 'uname' is. At least I
can test that in this case.
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk