|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-16 12:59:36
"William E. Kempf" wrote:
[...]
> Recovery is hardly meaningless in this case. The recovery consisted of
> informing the user of his mistake,
I'd say "application's environmental problems" [or something like
that] that can't be handled/"recovered from" by the application...
but it actually MAY try to do something attempting "to recover"
FIRST].
> and probably asking him to try again.
After "fixing" the problem(s). And "batch processing" stuff will
probably end up in exit( EXIT_FAILURE ) [or its equivalent with
respect to "normal-termination-operation-failed"] at this point.
> That's certainly "recovery", and is hardly "meaningless".
Yep.
regards,
alexander.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk