Re: [boost] intel-linux-tools.jam

From: Toon Knapen (toon.knapen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-17 09:57:54

On Friday 17 January 2003 14:59, David Abrahams wrote:
> No, please restore that feature.  The build system offers no
> guarantees about the order in which specified libraries will be added
> to NEEDLIBS, and we'd rather work in all circumstances than save
> whatever miniscule amount of link time it takes to deal with the
> repetition.

Done.
Nevertheless I use bjam also for my own project (as you might know) and there 
I've always removed the duplication because I don't want to allow developers 
to create circulare dependencies. And the system has worked fine (thanks 
again jamboosters)

toon