|
Boost : |
From: Alexander Terekhov (terekhov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-18 10:52:50
Edward Diener wrote:
[...]
> the system for setting default parameters somehow being changed to solve
> this problem, so that a user can override a default without having to
> override all
> default parameters but that doesn't seem to solve the problem in my mind.
> Something clearer and cleaner is needed but I don't know what it is.
You might want to take a look at this:
http://groups.google.com/groups?threadm=199608081434.IAA07848%40ncar.ucar.EDU
(Subject: comp.std.c++: Default arguments)
The "bottom line" was:
...why not provide an additional meaning for the "default" keyword...
Well, the question/problem/suggestion didn't raise much attention, however.
regards,
alexander.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk