|
Boost : |
From: Eric Niebler (neric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-20 18:37:36
By the same reasoning, is_convertible<void(), void(*)()> should evaluate to
true, since a function type is implicitly convertible to its pointer type.
But given the current implementation (1.29.0),
is_convertible<void(),void(*)()> doesn't compile.
Opinions? Is this just too nit-picky?
Eric
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk