[boost] updated shifted_ptr<> + question

From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-22 08:59:28

I have noticed that constant static local variables were preventing member
functions to be inlined under gcc 2.95.  Now fixed.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/shifted_ptr.zip

Now, it's been a while I did not worked on any locking mechanism but if I am
accessing one counter and the increment instruction is atomic, why would I
need to lock anything?

Philippe A. Bouchard