[boost] Re: Re: Re: Review results: Optional library

From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-23 13:13:18

"William E. Kempf" <wekempf_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4235.167.16.75.51.1043392575.squirrel_at_frodo.kempf-ville.com...
>
> Fernando Cacciola said:
> > I've committed "Jamfile" to libs/optional/test.
> >
> > But I can't run bjam on my Win98 configuration (long command lines
> > problem), so I can't test it.
>
> Doesn't bjam have a fix for this issue?
>
Not for Windows, AFAICT.

> > Could someone test the jamfile? If it works, I'l add the entry on
> > status/Jamfile.
>
> It passes for me (well, sort of, toolset for vc7, vc71 and gcc-nocygwin
> pass, while msvc fails).

hmmm. I'll take a look at those on which it fails when the regressions are
fully run.

>  However, shouldn't you be using "run" instead of
> "unit-test" in the Jamfile?
>
Yes :-)  I was looking at the wrong examples.

Fixed now. (could you re-test it?)

--
Fernando Cacciola