|
Boost : |
From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-23 13:30:40
On Thursday, January 23, 2003, at 07:14 PM, Dan Gohman wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> The reason for special-casing the Cray X1 here is so that int_fast16_t
> isn't defined to be short, as short has performance penalties
> associated
> with it on this platform.
Hi Dan,
I missed that point. Yes, you are right int_fast16_t should be int on
the X1.
I guess we could also define it as short on the SV1 and other machnes
with 32 bit shorts. Unfortunately there is no 16 bit integer type on
those machines.
Matthias
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk