|
Boost : |
From: Jason House (jhouse_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-23 14:30:05
I tried to do the following implementation in visual studio 6 to see if
I could get a named pair class.
I tried a number of approaches, but none worked with my compiler. Is my
approach fundamentally flawed?
I think that something like this would be a useful utility to have.
Anyone have any ideas on how to improve the class?
********************************
template <typename _T1, int _Name1, typename _T2, int _Name2>
class named_pair{
public:
template <int _Name>
class var{};
class var<_Name1>{
public:
_T1 value;
}
class var<_Name2>{
_T2 value;
}
};
enum{ Cash, Name };
void main(int argc, char *argv[]){
named_pair<float, Cash, char*, Name> foobar;
foobar.var<Cash>.value = 32.2;
foobar.var<Name>.value = "Fred";
}
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk