Re: [boost] Re: is_convertible: rationale and wording

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-28 07:58:33

> is there, among the uses of is_convertible that you have listed, any
> usage where no expression could be used (so that you would need to see
> if the "type" is convertible)?

Yes - named template parameters form the main example of that, concept
checking another (although in that case you could probably get hold of a
variable if you really wanted to).

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm