Re: [boost] Re: Re: SmartPtr (Loki) - auto_ptr/move c'tor issue

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-28 12:47:26

From: "Andrei Alexandrescu" <andrewalex_at_[hidden]>
> "David B. Held" <dheld_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:b16e3r$u0n$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> > "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > > It depends on what your design goals are. If you want to create the
> > > One True Smart Pointer Design, then yes, auto_ptr<> emulation is a
> > > must.
> >
> > I think this is a good goal. ;>
>
> I've shown with facts that it's less of an unattainable goal than it might
> seen.

Yep. But my question was: do you really need to do this, not: can you do
this. ;-)