Re: [boost] Re: Re: is_base_and_derived question

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-30 07:23:27

> To me this is a bad idea, from a usability point of view. I strongly
> object against making this change. The argument ordering is perfectly
> obvious in is_base_and_derived, there is no such hint in is_base.

Personally I agree, I will bring this up again with the LWG folks,

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm