Re: [boost] Re: SmartPtr (Loki) - auto_ptr/move c'tor issue

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-31 07:27:03

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:

> In short, trying to support auto_ptr, shared_ptr, and weak_ptr will either
> destroy the design, or make it stronger. :-)

Didn't we decide weak_ptr isn't a _ptr after all?  If so, doesn't that
get Dave off the hook for trying to support it using the smart_ptr
facade?

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution