Re: [boost] Re: is_base_and_derived question

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-01-31 08:27:25

"John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]> writes:

>> Maybe you had the following variation on Terje's code in mind.
>>
>> The following worked with GCC3.1/2, VC6/7/7.1 and Comeau 4.3.0.1:
>
> Hey, now that one really does work well, I'm still testing here (doesn't
> work with Borland, but I have a fallback position for that), but if there
> are no objections then you should expect to see the boost code updated soon.
> One question though - a lot of people seem to have worked on this: which
> people deserve the copyright/credit listing?

Soooo... Somewhere back in this thread Peter Dimov raised a serious
question about whether this implements the semantics we want.  Was
there ever agreement on that?

-- 
                       David Abrahams
   dave_at_[hidden] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution