From: Rani Sharoni (rani_sharoni_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-01 14:06:13
"John Maddock" <john_maddock_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> OK the new version of is_base_and_derived is checked in, along with
> test cases, can someone who understands the implementation (I'm absolutely
> sure that I don't !), please provide an explanation to add to the header?
> BTW I have looked at Terje's explanation, but the subtle changes to the
> Rani's implementation make in no longer quite applicable (although I may
> missing something).
Terje's fine explanation holds (just change reference to pointer).
I think that link to the original c.l.c++.m posting might be helpful
especially because it contains a link to an explanation by probably the most
authorized person in C++ overloading - Steve Adamczyk.
The c.l.c++.m posting -
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk