From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-03 01:53:54
>>ghost> I think the best approach would be to make this concept explicit, and
>>ghost> independent from BGL. Something like
>>ghost> pair<vertex_name_t, int >,
>>ghost> pair<vertex_distance_t, int> > > c;
>>ghost> c[vertex_name_t()] = 10;
>>ghost> I wonder if something like this already exists... I vaguely recall
>>ghost> someone was doing that.
>>Yes, Emily Winch was working on this, and I thought she was going to
>>submit to boost. The following URL has a paper she wrote about this.
> I would be very happy to submit it to boost, and several people have
> suggested this. I think it would be a mistake to submit it for a formal
> review without any prior discussion.
> I have mentioned this a couple of times now, and the lack of feedback
> led me to think that nobody was particularly interested in it. That's
> easy to believe, since when I wrote the paper it was really more from a
> "hey, this is cool" perspective than "hey, this would be really useful".
> However, people keep asking about it, or suggesting similar ideas, which
> suggests that there is some interest.
> So, I have a question: Why no feedback?
Personally, I did not really notice your announcements. Some time ago
I wanted a dynamic type-indexed container, in which you specify the
required type, and it's either returned, or created. After quite look
on some email of yours I decided it's something different and stopped reading.
Now I think that using associative_list in BGL is desirable.
(BTW, looks like with a little tweak I can achive the desired
on-demand creation using your library, too).
> a) The library is not something that people think makes sense in Boost.
> b) The library uses the wrong approach to the problem and someone should
> submit something else.
> c) The library is not something that anyone would really use. (Hey,
> Jeremy. I'm sure you said you would use it).
Did Jeremy say that? It would be great!
> d) People think it's a great idea but just never got round to having a
> look or making any comments.
So true! However, I'll do my best to look at your library in detail during
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk