From: Greg Colvin (Gregory.Colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-04 21:37:14
At 07:25 PM 2/4/2003, Paul Mensonides wrote:
>If an implicit conversion to the pointed-to type is provided, there is no need to overload the subscript operator:
>The same applies to the standing problem of operator->*().
Yep. More reasons why I prefer that smart pointers have an
operator T*. But my view has always been a minority opinion,
in this as in so many other things.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk