[boost] Re: Smart pointers: One more implementation +question

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-05 13:00:17

"Dave Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:04dc01c2cd3a$219279c0$7901a8c0_at_penguin...
> [...]
> Lots of ways. For example, the smart pointer objects could be
> bigger than neccessary.

;)  I'm working on it!

> [...]
> Type generators are overkill, since unlike with iterator adaptors
> there's no need to preserve type identity.  Normal inheritance will
> work just fine.

That's a good point.  Do you think public inheritance is ok, or
should private be used?

Dave