From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-05 13:00:17
"Dave Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Lots of ways. For example, the smart pointer objects could be
> bigger than neccessary.
;) I'm working on it!
> Type generators are overkill, since unlike with iterator adaptors
> there's no need to preserve type identity. Normal inheritance will
> work just fine.
That's a good point. Do you think public inheritance is ok, or
should private be used?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk