From: Alisdair Meredith (alisdair.meredith_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-07 19:07:43
Again, a nasty case of patching the tests rather than the library :¬ (
It appears borland ADL is not up to the task of handling the interval
library test cases. Looking at the fail lists, I suspect it is not the
only compiler to suffer.
I suggest adding another boost defect: BOOST_BROKEN_ADL (or similar)
and in the Interval library test cpps adding the three lines
#if defined( BOOST_BROKEN_ADL )
using namespace boost::numeric::interval_lib;
before the main code starts.
I have not tested extensively, but borland now passes the test cases I
have converted. In any event, it is now testing the interval library,
rather than ADL rules ;¬ )
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk