From: Dave Gomboc (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-07 22:07:32
> I suggest adding another boost defect: BOOST_BROKEN_ADL (or similar)
How about BOOST_LIBRARY_IMPL_VULNERABLE_TO_ADL? It's not that the
compiler's ADL implementation is broken, it's that the library
implementation isn't protected against ADL lookups where it needs to be.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk