From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-08 10:11:22
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> Well, I don't really feel like arguing about this much longer.
> I'd love to contribute to this discussion but there's no firm ground to
> stand on. What _are_ the concepts being discussed? I think I see
> AsyncCall(function<R ()> f);
> void operator()();
> // effects: f();
> R result() const;
> // if operator()() hasn't been invoked, throw;
> // if operator()() is still executing, block;
> // otherwise, return the value returned by f().
> but I'm not sure.
That's the general idea. Of course we can haggle over the syntactic
details, but the main question is whether you can get a return value
from invoking a thread function or whether you have to declare some
"global" state and ask the thread function to modify it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk