From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-11 07:13:08
On Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:40:20 -0000, "John Maddock"
>> Well, the title says it all :-) I would like to have a separate source
>> file for the ubiquitous BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT. I have several files
>> that use BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT but no real config macro. For those
>> ones, I currently have something like
>> #include "boost/config.hpp" // for BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT
>> #include "boost/config/static_constant.hpp"
>> be preferable?
Ok, you've said "yes"!
> but BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT is dependent upon the config, even if the rest
>of your code is not, sorry :-/
Which is what I said in reply to Gustavo. That doesn't mean that you
have to include boost/config *instead* of static_constant.hpp.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk