From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-13 12:37:09
On Thu, 13 Feb 2003 11:52:59 -0000, "John Maddock"
>I hear what you say, but I keep coming back to: this is largely an Intel
>compiler specific problem,
No, it's a matter of not making a silent use of non standard features.
>and most users really do expect their libraries
>to support long long whenever the compiler does.
Maybe. But we can't second such attitudes. Otherwise someone might
expect __complex__, or incomplete enumeration types. Where do you
>Personally I don't want to
>have to answer a flood of questions along the lines of "why doesn't
>some_type_trait<long long> work correctly?"
Oh, that's really underestimating users' intelligence.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk