From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-13 16:57:00
"Boris Schäling" <boris_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Noone knows as there is no consensus on how the library's
> architecture should look like. There are different approaches and
> proposals at Boost Wiki and in the sandbox but what's still missing
> is the big picture. As far as there are no ideas of how to get a
> reasonable model which incorporates different things like
> blocking/non-blocking/multiplexing/asynchronous/extensible... there
> won't be much progress. I've been thinking about that and hope to
> come up with an idea in a few days.
How about borrowing ideas from ACE, but implementing them in
modern C++? Or has that been discussed already? Or is the ACE
framework too obsolete-C++ to be a useful design?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk