From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-14 18:19:51
"Rozental, Gennadiy" <gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I could not afford boost::function dependency in so low level
> component as execution_monitor (or even unit_test_monitor). If we
> will be able to design it as pluggable extension to Boost.Test I would
> of course prefer the way you implemented it in Boost.Python with
> boost::function0<void> argument.
I second this point. I had a problem with shared_ptr<> visibility in a
policy_ptr test. It would be nice if Boost.Test relied on as few other
libraries as possible.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk