From: Carl Daniel (cpdaniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-17 17:29:22
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Curiosity got the better of me, and I did an experimental run on build
> Looks pretty good. A vast improvement over prior releases. Problems
> * Missing overloads for long long.
> * boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp line 153 giving it fits.
> * A few other scattered failures on code working for other
> I'm not going to post the results; no point in worrying about
> until we see what the actual shipped version does.
I have the RC1 version, build 2346. Unfortunately, I'm not in a
position to run the regression tests on any regular basis. Hopefully
someone else with build 2292 or 2346 can run them at least now & then.
>From what I recall from earlier testing, most of the problems with this
compiler stem from workarounds put in for earlier VC versions that
aren't disabled for _MSC_VER >= 0x1310.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk