From: Eric Friedman (ebf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-18 18:30:07
David B. Held wrote:
> I realize that the operator ought to be const. But should the reference
> be? I guess I don't know if you should be able to call a d'tor on a
> const& or not.
My understanding is that since the following is legal...
const T* p = ...;
...so is what you see in variant.hpp:
const T& r = ...;
Even if my understanding is correct though, it may be best for destroyer to
take a non-const reference to avoid confusion.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk