[boost] Re: Repost: Borland related patches

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-19 06:08:46

Alisdair Meredith wrote:

> [Note: I am now using a proposed new defect-detection macro,
> BOOST_NO_STATIC_CONST_AS_TEMPLATE_PARAM, currently only defined for
> borland <=0x0570]

Did you try to define BOOST_NO_INCLASS_MEMBER_INITIALIZATION for 
borland? This will toggle BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT to use the enum 
workaround and might fix most of the problems you are having with BCC 
not allowing static constant members as integral constant expressions 
in template parameters.

This trick is used in the Visual Age toolset.

Markus