From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-21 09:54:03
Alexander Terekhov <terekhov_at_[hidden]> writes:
| Ken Hagan wrote:
| [ ... &k ... ]
| > So presumably we are all now in complete agreement, except perhaps
| I, for one, believe strongly that "&k" is nothing but
| It *isn't* a compile-time constant (just like &errno isn't a compile
| time constant).
Right now, what you said matches my understanding of the issue.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk