Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-02-21 10:29:33

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] shared_from_this overload suggestion"
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] type traits proposal"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "[boost] Cargill article on exception safety"
Next in thread: Jon Kalb: "Re: [boost] Cargill article on exception safety"

Anthony Williams <anthony.williamsNOSPAM_at_[hidden]> writes:

> The link to Cargill's article in more/generic_exception_safety.html is no
> longer valid. The correct link is:
>
> http://www.awprofessional.com/content/images/020163371x/supplements/Exception_Handling_Article.html

Fixed, thanks!

> (Why it is a "supplement" to More Effective C++ is beyond me)

;-) FUD is dead, long live FUD!

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] shared_from_this overload suggestion"
Previous message: John Maddock: "[boost] type traits proposal"
In reply to: Anthony Williams: "[boost] Cargill article on exception safety"
Next in thread: Jon Kalb: "Re: [boost] Cargill article on exception safety"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk