From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-02 22:11:54
"Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
> > Do you have a use-case for this?
> Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to
> use it this way? I am not sure, but it would be better for continous
> optional<>s this way?
Dave is asking you if you are solving a problem that doesn't exist. ;)
Your answer seems to indicate as much. ;)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk