[boost] Re: postponed<> proposal

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-02 22:11:54

"Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:b3trii$j3i$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >
> >>     I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
> >
> > Do you have a use-case for this?
>
> Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to
> use it this way?  I am not sure, but it would be better for continous
> optional<>s this way?

Dave is asking you if you are solving a problem that doesn't exist. ;)
Your answer seems to indicate as much. ;)

Dave