Boost logo

Boost :

From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-02 23:20:00


"Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:b3uj8q$uv9$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> David B. Held wrote:
>
> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > news:b3trii$j3i$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> >> David Abrahams wrote:
> >>
> >> > "Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> writes:
> >> >
> >> >> I would like some feedback about the logic behind it.
> >> >
> >> > Do you have a use-case for this?
> >>
> >> Sorry, I do not understand; you mean someone that would want to
> >> use it this way? I am not sure, but it would be better for continous
> >> optional<>s this way?
> >
> > Dave is asking you if you are solving a problem that doesn't exist. ;)
> > Your answer seems to indicate as much. ;)
>
> I do not have any use-case. Thanks anyways.
>
> Maybe it would be better to simply disable EH overhead with some BOOST
> macro. _That_ would be really really great then...
>
>
Which EH overhead?

Anyway, the problem with your proposal is that as I said before the
boolean flag is initialized before the object is really constructed.

Fernando Cacciola


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk