From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-03 07:59:48
Robert Allan Schwartz wrote:
>>> I believe a "standardized" (within Boost), portable, and *readable*
>>> text representation of T makes my proposal better than typeid().
>> I think if readability is the main criterion we'd do much better to
>> invest in decoding the typeids generated by GCC. I believe there's
>> even a library that comes with it that does that job.
> Why should millions of programmers have to make that "invest"ment?
> Wouldn't it be better if gcc simply generated better type names?
Sure, if there existed an unambiguous definition of "better type name".
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk