From: Jason House (jhouse_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-03 09:17:59
Dirk Gerrits wrote:
> Jason House wrote:
> > I'm thinking that it would be nice to be able to us define distinct
> > types based on strings (the fundamental type const char * and not
> > std::string). The intended use is in templates.
> Well I'm just curious how you would like to accomplish this. String
> literals as template parameters don't really work all that well, if I
> recall correctly. Then again, I might be wrong.
Well, I know that in MSVC simply refuses to use strings as template
parameters... If this truly is illegal by the standard, then a string
template parameter could default to a type for that string. As far as
use in other places, maybe use of some keyword as a function. Like
I was hoping to try and get discussion about utility before trying to
figure out the best way to try and get it to be available.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk