Re: [boost] Boost.signal with gcc 3.3 or gcc 3.4

From: Douglas Gregor (gregod_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-03 12:13:55

On Monday 03 March 2003 11:42 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I have been trying, but gcc failes with an ICE. Of course gcc should
> not segfault, but I am trying to find out if it is an segfault on
> valid code or if it is an segfault on illegal code.
> I have not been successful on finding a small testcase so far...

I believe it is valid code. The EDG front end accepts it on its strictest 
mode, if that means anything.

        Doug