Boost logo

Boost :

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 08:26:16

Daniel Frey <daniel.frey_at_[hidden]> writes:

> I greped for it and it seems it is not used very often. How about using
> BOOST_WORKAROUND to keep the code local and thus not hide the actual
> workaround in a MACRO and spread to knowledge? Especially given it's
> only a workaround for a single compiler. Or do you think it is

I do.

> and will be used a lot in the future

Maybe not a lot, but often enough. I'm sure we have quite a few
synonyms for it in various headers. Did you search for just

I find


OK, I'm tired of typing these now.

It really uglifies code to have to add the workaround every place you
need it.

Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at