Boost logo

Boost :

From: Robert Klarer (klarer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-06 20:52:04

Terje Slettebø wrote:

> If run-time computation is ok, and that one only wants to avoid dynamical
> allocation, then one might do something like I used in another posting in
> this thread:
> template<class CharType, int N>
> class fixed_size_string;
> template<class CharType, int N1, int N2>
> fixed_size_string<CharType, N1+N2> operator+(const
> fixed_size_string<CharType, N1> &s1, const fixed_size_string<CharType, N2>
> &s2);

An implementation of basic_string that uses the small string optimization already
implements something very close to this. We don't need to specify an entirely new
kind of string to benefit from this technique.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at