Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0 compile error with SGI MIPSpro Compilers

From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-07 18:56:29

--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It's easy enough to test it with a little program that prints the
> value you have.

OK, OK, OK, David. I know that MIPSpro == EDG 238, what I don't know is which
EDG version fixes the problem. Is this better?

Index: is_base_and_derived.hpp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/type_traits/is_base_and_derived.hpp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -r1.4 is_base_and_derived.hpp
27c27,31
< #if !defined(__BORLANDC__)
---
> #if !defined(__BORLANDC__) \
>  && !(defined(__EDG_VERSION__) && __EDG_VERSION__ <= 238)
>                              // The EDG version number is a lower estimate.
>                              // It is not currently known which EDG version
>                              // exactly fixes the problem.
>     (failed-as-expected) ...
>     **passed** ...
> 
> unless -d0 caused that to be suppressed, in which case we should
> remove the -d0 I guess.
I don't use -d0, but I don't see that **passed** message anywhere.
Something else is not right: The other "fail" tests are only built once, but
the as_to_python_function.cpp test is built each time I enter bjam again.
That's why you see the failure on our auto-built "test" pages.
Ralf
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/