From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-07 18:56:29
--- David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It's easy enough to test it with a little program that prints the
> value you have.
OK, OK, OK, David. I know that MIPSpro == EDG 238, what I don't know is which
EDG version fixes the problem. Is this better?
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/type_traits/is_base_and_derived.hpp,v
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -r1.4 is_base_and_derived.hpp
< #if !defined(__BORLANDC__)
--- > #if !defined(__BORLANDC__) \ > && !(defined(__EDG_VERSION__) && __EDG_VERSION__ <= 238) > // The EDG version number is a lower estimate. > // It is not currently known which EDG version > // exactly fixes the problem. > (failed-as-expected) ... > **passed** ... > > unless -d0 caused that to be suppressed, in which case we should > remove the -d0 I guess. I don't use -d0, but I don't see that **passed** message anywhere. Something else is not right: The other "fail" tests are only built once, but the as_to_python_function.cpp test is built each time I enter bjam again. That's why you see the failure on our auto-built "test" pages. Ralf __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk