From: Paul Mensonides (pmenso57_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-08 02:52:05
Hartmut Kaiser wrote:
> At the first steps it is not planned to make a very high performance
> very small C++ preprocessor. If you are looking for these objectives
> you probably have to look at other places.
Please note that the EDG preprocessor will outperform the Wave preprocessor in
simple cases. However, as complexity increases, time dilates expontentially on
EDG. Preprocessing time dilates linearly under Wave, which causes it to easily
outperform EDG when complexity increases.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk