From: John Madock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-09 07:41:33
> > Well, I think you're right, but the question remains: what should we
> > do about it? Should we just replace BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME?
> That's what I would do. John?
If I remember correcty Dave introduced that macro anyway, so yes go ahead
and change it- can you make sure that the config test case stays up to date
with the changed meaning though?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk