From: Gennaro Prota (gennaro_prota_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-10 10:45:21
On Sun, 09 Mar 2003 18:46:47 -0500, David Abrahams
>> Well, why hardcoding that dependency?
>You don't have to; it was just an example implementation. Another
>implementation would be:
>template <class T>
> BOOST_STATIC_CONSTANT(T, value = /*whatever*/);
> typedef const_min<T> type;
> typedef T value_type;
Ah, sure! :-) Now this is really metaprogramming-compatible rather
than boost::mpl-dependent. Gone! Thanks for the idea.
>> I still don't understand... it must be one of those C++ programmers
>> eccentricities ;-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk