|
Boost : |
From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-14 23:23:29
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
news:un0jz1ap3.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> "Fernando Cacciola" <software_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with
BCC5.6.0(4)
>
> I guess in that case BOOST_TYPENAME or BOOST_NO_TYPENAME might be an
> appropriate name.
I like BOOST_TYPENAME, FWIW.
> I'm glad I didn't move on the renaming before you
> revealed the Borland issue!
>
Me too...
I would have spoken early, but Internet Access became very restricted on the
office,
so it took me some time to arrange things to get back to a regular list
reading,
and I missed quite some posts during the transition.
I'm not on-line during the whole day anymore, but I'm getting in a couple of
times
daily.
Fernando Cacciola
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk