From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-14 23:23:29
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> escribió en el mensaje
> "Fernando Cacciola" <software_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > With BCC5.5.1 typename is _never required_ AFAIK, but it is with
> I guess in that case BOOST_TYPENAME or BOOST_NO_TYPENAME might be an
> appropriate name.
I like BOOST_TYPENAME, FWIW.
> I'm glad I didn't move on the renaming before you
> revealed the Borland issue!
I would have spoken early, but Internet Access became very restricted on the
so it took me some time to arrange things to get back to a regular list
and I missed quite some posts during the transition.
I'm not on-line during the whole day anymore, but I'm getting in a couple of
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk