From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-16 17:34:18
At 07:00 AM 3/16/2003, John Maddock wrote:
>My sincere apologies over the is_class fiasco: those changes were never
>meant to be checked in. I've being trying all morning to revert to the
>earlier version, but all I'm seeing is:
>cvs server: [03:56:46] waiting for johnmaddock's lock in
>but hold on a minute that's me!
>I'll keep trying a while longer, and if necessary come back and try again
>tomorrow morning, otherwise if someone else can get cvs to respond then
>ahead and please revert that file, thanks, and apologies once again.
Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as of Sunday 6PM
US Eastern time.
Today's Win32 RC_1_30_0 regression tests (just posted) are showing new
fails for VC++ 6 and VC++ 7 on is_polymorphic_test and is_reference_test.
Are these related to the is_class problem?
I'll go over the do-list again after dinner, but it looks like almost all
problems have been cleared except for this one.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk