Re: [boost] RC_1_30_0: gcc 2.96 boost/libs/python/test/opaque.cpp failure

From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-18 09:04:21

"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk_at_[hidden]> writes:

> That change does not seem to make a difference. The compiler errors are still
> exactly the same.

Does 2.96 want the default argument (=0) to be repeated?
-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com