From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-19 09:19:24
At 08:54 AM 3/19/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
>I don't know how close the release schedule is now, but if we could at
>least change the version check from 0x0561 to 0x0564 that would be
>This would make the difference between our being able to use boost 1_30
>'out-the-box' (as I half-promised our deparment) and having to apply
>in-house patches again.
>I am currently doing a search for other places where borland v 0x0561 is
>assumed, as I don't think the latest patch fixed any issues that would
>affect boost and it would be a shame to have to choose between boost and
>(especially as Samuel put so much effort into getting this version to be
>Borland compatible! I have mailed him separately off-list in case he is
>not actively monitoring right now, but I know release is close)
OK, I've made the second set of suggested changes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk