From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2003-03-21 00:38:52
> Hum... I just had a thought. What if the output was reformatted as an html
> table? One row per library with columns for the error counts for the
> different kinds of errors. Click through to see the actual error messages.
> That would give us an overview we could watch as we approached releases.
> Anyone like to volunteer to write such a program? It should probably be
> separate from inspect itself to separate the concern of detecting errors
> separate from reporting concerns.
Meanwhile I updated xenu broken links report here:
Looks useful. It does not provide a statistics though.
P.S. I have a feeling that it gives false alarms simetimes (rarely). Don't
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk